Air travel has lost much of its glamour. Can behavioural economics help bring it back?

Airport glamour
Posted in Behavioural economics (Airports, Travel) Jon Waring by Jon Waring on 17 Feb 2011. 4 comments

When we talk about travelling by air, several words immediately spring to mind: Stressful. Queues. Fear. These aren't made up. I asked a few work colleagues who arrived at this rather shaky consensus, but I'd be surprised if you disagreed. But what about glamorous and exciting?

The glamour of air travel appears to have been eroded as budget airlines bring prices down, along with travelling standards. Airports, under pressure from security requirements, have become giant queues and despite the British love/hate relationship with queuing, it does feel like many airports have lost their mojo.

When did air travel lose its glamour and what would it take to bring back the magic?

It doesn't seem that long ago that people dressed smartly to fly, and I'm fairly sure the changes have happened within my lifetime, probably around the glorious year of my birth, 1966. In that year, a chap called Freddie Laker started a business modestly named 'Laker Airways'. A 'no frills' airline business model that has become the blueprint for EasyJet, Virgin and Ryanair.

I remember in the mid 70s, flying to see my grandmother in Spain every Christmas. My parents would drop me at the airport with a giant hang tag around my neck reading 'Unaccompanied Minor'. Don't worry, this isn't about parenting skills, really it's not. What I remember is the glamour of it all. An extremely chic stewardess would hold my hand and parade me through the airport, to the inevitable 'oohs and aahs’ of the other passengers. Or at least, that's how I remember it. And while my memory may be a little rose tinted, it was definitely a special event.

Airports can still be positively emotional places. In departure we feel the anticipation of a new destination, at arrivals the excitement of meeting family or friends. I am thinking of 'that scene' in Love Actually . And if you have 73 seconds, see how it makes you feel and you'll get my drift.

So why do some airports no longer reflect or tap into this?

At 3Sixty, we've been working with the IPA on their Behavioural Economics task force and much of what we've learned could be applied to airports, changing perceptions or designing experiences so that customers feel good.

For example, what if we made queues fun? Would it matter that it took 45 minutes to get to the front? Probably not, provided you weren't already late. Look at Disneyland. They don't see queuing as purely logistical; they try to change the experience by making it part of the ride.

How about a loyalty programme that, in return for various levels of data, gives free trolleys, wireless connectivity and discounts on parking? So now, instead of a disgruntled customer, you have an advocate that, our research has shown, can spend up to three times more.

Or, what if, just after you've been told to throw away stuff like your bottled water or shaving foam, security offered you coupons to replace them? People typically spend more than the face value of any voucher, so retailers get more money and the airport comes across as helpful.

Implementing creative ideas like these could make money for airports at little to no cost, shifting customers focus from the negative to the exciting. Or, dare I say it, even a return to the glamorous side of air travel.

Image of 1959 Boeing- 707_main-lounge courtesy of x-ray delta one.

4 comments

Boarding an easyJet plane back from Madeira, any possible elegance in the boarding procedure was destroyed because of the new low-cost policy of charging for checked-in luggage.Now no-one goes to Madeira for the weekend. Everyone will have several cases. But in a desperate bid to reduce the fees they pay for checked luggage, everyone was boarding with insane volumes of carry-on luggage. Actually fitting the stuff into overhead lockers required 10 minutes of chaotic juggling, and massively slowed the boarding procedure, while someone crushed my laptop with a ludicrous backpack. It also turned the plane into something like a Nepalese bus. There were bags everywhere.Normally I quite like the low-cost approach which is;you pay for what you use and not for what you don't&. That's because the money saving activities of my co-passengers impose no costs on me. If the person in front of me doesn't want to pay £2 for a cup of tea, I get my tea all the sooner. If they don't want to pay for a sandwich, ditto.But this luggage policy is a disaster, as it mean the stinginess of my fellow passengers imposes a negative externality on me. (Some of the buggers seemed to be wearing multiple layers of clothing, making the cabin more crowded still......). I would guess it delayed departure by about 10 minutes, too.Now I don't know how airports charge airlines for baggage handling, but this is ridiculous. I think it is fair to a degree to pass on costs to passengers, but this is a bad example. You could also change pricing so that you get to check-in two bags for the price of one or you can check in three for only £1 more than it costs to check-in two. This would at least encourage people who have to check in at least one bag to check in all their bags. This is a strange policy in many ways. It also imposes costs on leisure flyers (who are very price sensitive) and saves money for luggageless business travellers who are less price sensitive.
Rory Sutherland 14:32 22 Feb 2011
Rory, Here’s an example of a helpful airline: Asiana the South Korean airline has a coat keeping service for passengers going to a warmer climate. http://www.airlinetrends.com/2011/02/09/airlines-coat-storage-service/A small idea which probably makes a big difference to perception of the airline.
Jon Waring 08:40 25 Feb 2011
Two issues here.
1. Can behavioural economics help Birmingham Airport? No. Behavioural economics is simply new jargon, an attempt at making seem scientific what we old soldiers of advertising used to call having 'an idea'.
Behavioural economics implies that there is a process by which you can turn a sow's ear into a silk purse. An 'idea', though, even if it emerges from a genuine insight into what makes people tick, coupled with an inspired leap of faith, is altogether trickier to talk about in the boardroom.
2. Can air travel be turned into something it is not? No. Anything mass market loses its glamour for the very reason that it is everyday and commonplace. Concorde had glamour because only 2 airlines had it; and because it was insanely expensive.
That said, there are some simple things Birmingham Airport can do (and will be doing thanks to the ideas you've been having at 3Sixty) to make the experience less dehumanising and less stressful. But behavioural economics will have sod all to do with it!
Bah humbug!!!
Patrick Collister 18:37 08 Mar 2011
It generates insights, not ideas. That's the vital distinction.

And ideas based on scientifically validated insights are indeed easier to explain.

But BE is an aid to creativity, not a substitute.
Rory Sutherland 08:13 09 Mar 2011

Leave a comment

(required)
(optional)